Cross Examining Experts in the
Behavioral Sciences
Terence W. Campbell and Demosthenes Lorandos
Provides
step-by-step guidance how to refute behavioral
scientists’ conjecture and speculation to ensure
favorable rulings on Daubert, Kumho Tire,
and Frye standards. Integrates hundreds
of questioning strategies and actual questions
to save you time and energy in preparing your
cases. Demonstrates how to examine and challenge
the expertise of mental health experts and the
use of psychological tests. Details both the
scientific research and the legal aspects behind
a mental health expert’s testimony.
Summary of contents:
-
Mental Health Experts:
Science and the Law
-
Who Qualifies As An
Expert?
-
Challenging Clinical
Judgment
-
Challenging Claims Of
Professional Experience
-
Challenging Diagnostic
Classification
-
Psychological
Testing—Objective Tests
-
Psychological
Testing—Projective Tests
-
Child Custody
Evaluations and Appropriate Standards Of
Psychological Practice
-
Predicting Future
Violence
-
Psychotherapy and
Appropriate Standards Of Practice
-
Sample Motions
|
View Table of Contents and introductory material.
For more information,
click here. |